Capacity Assessment Framework

Capacity Domains

DomainAssessment Question
Policy capacityCan the institution design an effective intervention?
Legal capacityCan the institution’s authority survive challenge?
Administrative capacityCan the institution manage the operational complexity required?
Technical capacityCan the institution’s systems support the required functions?
Contractor managementCan the institution effectively oversee external vendors?
Financial capacityAre resources available and allocable?
Political capacityCan the institution sustain support for the intervention?
Adaptive capacityCan the institution diagnose failure and restructure its approach?

Rating Scale

RatingDefinition
StrongDomain capability clearly present and demonstrated
AdequateDomain capability sufficient for the task
WeakDomain capability present but insufficient
Critically AbsentDomain capability not present when required
UnknownInsufficient evidence to assess

Key Principle

Capacity is domain-specific. An institution may be strong in some domains and critically weak in others. The diagnosis must identify which domains were insufficient for the specific task, not issue a general judgment of “capable” or “incapable.”

Cross-Case Validation

  • Case #001: Department of Education showed strong administrative and technical capacity but weak legal capacity.
  • Case #002: CMS showed strong policy and legal capacity but critically weak technical and contractor management capacity.
  • Case #003: NHTSA showed adequate-to-strong capacity across all relevant domains.

Change Log

VersionDateChangesRationaleEvidence
v1.02026-07-11Initial Capacity Assessment FrameworkExtracted from PL-101 Project Loom Ontology v0.3 and PL-201 Loom Analysis Protocol v1.1Cases #001, #002, #003